summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/packages/cli/src/ui/hooks/slashCommandProcessor.test.ts
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAbhi <[email protected]>2025-07-22 00:34:55 -0400
committerGitHub <[email protected]>2025-07-22 04:34:55 +0000
commit9daead63ddc4a0bddad05ec9f4bb7c0726da44f4 (patch)
treea756014f436f4cc356ca334a45494386027e7b4e /packages/cli/src/ui/hooks/slashCommandProcessor.test.ts
parent5f813ef51076177aadccc0046f2182310d6b0a1a (diff)
(feat): Initial Version of Custom Commands (#4572)
Diffstat (limited to 'packages/cli/src/ui/hooks/slashCommandProcessor.test.ts')
-rw-r--r--packages/cli/src/ui/hooks/slashCommandProcessor.test.ts257
1 files changed, 196 insertions, 61 deletions
diff --git a/packages/cli/src/ui/hooks/slashCommandProcessor.test.ts b/packages/cli/src/ui/hooks/slashCommandProcessor.test.ts
index 32a6810e..84eeb033 100644
--- a/packages/cli/src/ui/hooks/slashCommandProcessor.test.ts
+++ b/packages/cli/src/ui/hooks/slashCommandProcessor.test.ts
@@ -14,10 +14,17 @@ vi.mock('node:process', () => ({
},
}));
-const mockLoadCommands = vi.fn();
+const mockBuiltinLoadCommands = vi.fn();
vi.mock('../../services/BuiltinCommandLoader.js', () => ({
BuiltinCommandLoader: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({
- loadCommands: mockLoadCommands,
+ loadCommands: mockBuiltinLoadCommands,
+ })),
+}));
+
+const mockFileLoadCommands = vi.fn();
+vi.mock('../../services/FileCommandLoader.js', () => ({
+ FileCommandLoader: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({
+ loadCommands: mockFileLoadCommands,
})),
}));
@@ -28,11 +35,22 @@ vi.mock('../contexts/SessionContext.js', () => ({
import { act, renderHook, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react';
import { vi, describe, it, expect, beforeEach, type Mock } from 'vitest';
import { useSlashCommandProcessor } from './slashCommandProcessor.js';
-import { SlashCommand } from '../commands/types.js';
+import { CommandKind, SlashCommand } from '../commands/types.js';
import { Config } from '@google/gemini-cli-core';
import { LoadedSettings } from '../../config/settings.js';
import { MessageType } from '../types.js';
import { BuiltinCommandLoader } from '../../services/BuiltinCommandLoader.js';
+import { FileCommandLoader } from '../../services/FileCommandLoader.js';
+
+const createTestCommand = (
+ overrides: Partial<SlashCommand>,
+ kind: CommandKind = CommandKind.BUILT_IN,
+): SlashCommand => ({
+ name: 'test',
+ description: 'a test command',
+ kind,
+ ...overrides,
+});
describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
const mockAddItem = vi.fn();
@@ -55,11 +73,17 @@ describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks();
(vi.mocked(BuiltinCommandLoader) as Mock).mockClear();
- mockLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue([]);
+ mockBuiltinLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue([]);
+ mockFileLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue([]);
});
- const setupProcessorHook = (commands: SlashCommand[] = []) => {
- mockLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue(Object.freeze(commands));
+ const setupProcessorHook = (
+ builtinCommands: SlashCommand[] = [],
+ fileCommands: SlashCommand[] = [],
+ ) => {
+ mockBuiltinLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue(Object.freeze(builtinCommands));
+ mockFileLoadCommands.mockResolvedValue(Object.freeze(fileCommands));
+
const { result } = renderHook(() =>
useSlashCommandProcessor(
mockConfig,
@@ -83,18 +107,14 @@ describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
};
describe('Initialization and Command Loading', () => {
- it('should initialize CommandService with BuiltinCommandLoader', () => {
+ it('should initialize CommandService with all required loaders', () => {
setupProcessorHook();
- expect(BuiltinCommandLoader).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(BuiltinCommandLoader).toHaveBeenCalledWith(mockConfig);
+ expect(FileCommandLoader).toHaveBeenCalledWith(mockConfig);
});
it('should call loadCommands and populate state after mounting', async () => {
- const testCommand: SlashCommand = {
- name: 'test',
- description: 'a test command',
- kind: 'built-in',
- };
+ const testCommand = createTestCommand({ name: 'test' });
const result = setupProcessorHook([testCommand]);
await waitFor(() => {
@@ -102,15 +122,12 @@ describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
});
expect(result.current.slashCommands[0]?.name).toBe('test');
- expect(mockLoadCommands).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+ expect(mockBuiltinLoadCommands).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+ expect(mockFileLoadCommands).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});
it('should provide an immutable array of commands to consumers', async () => {
- const testCommand: SlashCommand = {
- name: 'test',
- description: 'a test command',
- kind: 'built-in',
- };
+ const testCommand = createTestCommand({ name: 'test' });
const result = setupProcessorHook([testCommand]);
await waitFor(() => {
@@ -121,13 +138,39 @@ describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
expect(() => {
// @ts-expect-error - We are intentionally testing a violation of the readonly type.
- commands.push({
- name: 'rogue',
- description: 'a rogue command',
- kind: 'built-in',
- });
+ commands.push(createTestCommand({ name: 'rogue' }));
}).toThrow(TypeError);
});
+
+ it('should override built-in commands with file-based commands of the same name', async () => {
+ const builtinAction = vi.fn();
+ const fileAction = vi.fn();
+
+ const builtinCommand = createTestCommand({
+ name: 'override',
+ description: 'builtin',
+ action: builtinAction,
+ });
+ const fileCommand = createTestCommand(
+ { name: 'override', description: 'file', action: fileAction },
+ CommandKind.FILE,
+ );
+
+ const result = setupProcessorHook([builtinCommand], [fileCommand]);
+
+ await waitFor(() => {
+ // The service should only return one command with the name 'override'
+ expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1);
+ });
+
+ await act(async () => {
+ await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/override');
+ });
+
+ // Only the file-based command's action should be called.
+ expect(fileAction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+ expect(builtinAction).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+ });
});
describe('Command Execution Logic', () => {
@@ -142,10 +185,10 @@ describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
// Expect 2 calls: one for the user's input, one for the error message.
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenLastCalledWith(
- expect.objectContaining({
+ {
type: MessageType.ERROR,
text: 'Unknown command: /nonexistent',
- }),
+ },
expect.any(Number),
);
});
@@ -154,12 +197,12 @@ describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
const parentCommand: SlashCommand = {
name: 'parent',
description: 'a parent command',
- kind: 'built-in',
+ kind: CommandKind.BUILT_IN,
subCommands: [
{
name: 'child1',
description: 'First child.',
- kind: 'built-in',
+ kind: CommandKind.BUILT_IN,
},
],
};
@@ -172,12 +215,12 @@ describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenLastCalledWith(
- expect.objectContaining({
+ {
type: MessageType.INFO,
text: expect.stringContaining(
"Command '/parent' requires a subcommand.",
),
- }),
+ },
expect.any(Number),
);
});
@@ -187,12 +230,12 @@ describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
const parentCommand: SlashCommand = {
name: 'parent',
description: 'a parent command',
- kind: 'built-in',
+ kind: CommandKind.BUILT_IN,
subCommands: [
{
name: 'child',
description: 'a child command',
- kind: 'built-in',
+ kind: CommandKind.BUILT_IN,
action: childAction,
},
],
@@ -222,12 +265,10 @@ describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
describe('Action Result Handling', () => {
it('should handle "dialog: help" action', async () => {
- const command: SlashCommand = {
+ const command = createTestCommand({
name: 'helpcmd',
- description: 'a help command',
- kind: 'built-in',
action: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ type: 'dialog', dialog: 'help' }),
- };
+ });
const result = setupProcessorHook([command]);
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1));
@@ -239,16 +280,14 @@ describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
});
it('should handle "load_history" action', async () => {
- const command: SlashCommand = {
+ const command = createTestCommand({
name: 'load',
- description: 'a load command',
- kind: 'built-in',
action: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
type: 'load_history',
history: [{ type: MessageType.USER, text: 'old prompt' }],
clientHistory: [{ role: 'user', parts: [{ text: 'old prompt' }] }],
}),
- };
+ });
const result = setupProcessorHook([command]);
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1));
@@ -258,7 +297,7 @@ describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
expect(mockClearItems).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
- expect.objectContaining({ type: 'user', text: 'old prompt' }),
+ { type: 'user', text: 'old prompt' },
expect.any(Number),
);
});
@@ -270,12 +309,10 @@ describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
const quitAction = vi
.fn()
.mockResolvedValue({ type: 'quit', messages: [] });
- const command: SlashCommand = {
+ const command = createTestCommand({
name: 'exit',
- description: 'an exit command',
- kind: 'built-in',
action: quitAction,
- };
+ });
const result = setupProcessorHook([command]);
await waitFor(() =>
@@ -300,15 +337,43 @@ describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
}
});
});
+
+ it('should handle "submit_prompt" action returned from a file-based command', async () => {
+ const fileCommand = createTestCommand(
+ {
+ name: 'filecmd',
+ description: 'A command from a file',
+ action: async () => ({
+ type: 'submit_prompt',
+ content: 'The actual prompt from the TOML file.',
+ }),
+ },
+ CommandKind.FILE,
+ );
+
+ const result = setupProcessorHook([], [fileCommand]);
+ await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1));
+
+ let actionResult;
+ await act(async () => {
+ actionResult = await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/filecmd');
+ });
+
+ expect(actionResult).toEqual({
+ type: 'submit_prompt',
+ content: 'The actual prompt from the TOML file.',
+ });
+
+ expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+ { type: MessageType.USER, text: '/filecmd' },
+ expect.any(Number),
+ );
+ });
});
describe('Command Parsing and Matching', () => {
it('should be case-sensitive', async () => {
- const command: SlashCommand = {
- name: 'test',
- description: 'a test command',
- kind: 'built-in',
- };
+ const command = createTestCommand({ name: 'test' });
const result = setupProcessorHook([command]);
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1));
@@ -319,23 +384,22 @@ describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
// It should fail and call addItem with an error
expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
- expect.objectContaining({
+ {
type: MessageType.ERROR,
text: 'Unknown command: /Test',
- }),
+ },
expect.any(Number),
);
});
it('should correctly match an altName', async () => {
const action = vi.fn();
- const command: SlashCommand = {
+ const command = createTestCommand({
name: 'main',
altNames: ['alias'],
description: 'a command with an alias',
- kind: 'built-in',
action,
- };
+ });
const result = setupProcessorHook([command]);
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1));
@@ -351,12 +415,7 @@ describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
it('should handle extra whitespace around the command', async () => {
const action = vi.fn();
- const command: SlashCommand = {
- name: 'test',
- description: 'a test command',
- kind: 'built-in',
- action,
- };
+ const command = createTestCommand({ name: 'test', action });
const result = setupProcessorHook([command]);
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1));
@@ -366,6 +425,82 @@ describe('useSlashCommandProcessor', () => {
expect(action).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.anything(), 'with-args');
});
+
+ it('should handle `?` as a command prefix', async () => {
+ const action = vi.fn();
+ const command = createTestCommand({ name: 'help', action });
+ const result = setupProcessorHook([command]);
+ await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(1));
+
+ await act(async () => {
+ await result.current.handleSlashCommand('?help');
+ });
+
+ expect(action).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+ });
+ });
+
+ describe('Command Precedence', () => {
+ it('should prioritize a command with a primary name over a command with a matching alias', async () => {
+ const quitAction = vi.fn();
+ const exitAction = vi.fn();
+
+ const quitCommand = createTestCommand({
+ name: 'quit',
+ altNames: ['exit'],
+ action: quitAction,
+ });
+
+ const exitCommand = createTestCommand(
+ {
+ name: 'exit',
+ action: exitAction,
+ },
+ CommandKind.FILE,
+ );
+
+ // The order of commands in the final loaded array is not guaranteed,
+ // so the test must work regardless of which comes first.
+ const result = setupProcessorHook([quitCommand], [exitCommand]);
+
+ await waitFor(() => {
+ expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(2);
+ });
+
+ await act(async () => {
+ await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/exit');
+ });
+
+ // The action for the command whose primary name is 'exit' should be called.
+ expect(exitAction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+ // The action for the command that has 'exit' as an alias should NOT be called.
+ expect(quitAction).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+ });
+
+ it('should add an overridden command to the history', async () => {
+ const quitCommand = createTestCommand({
+ name: 'quit',
+ altNames: ['exit'],
+ action: vi.fn(),
+ });
+ const exitCommand = createTestCommand(
+ { name: 'exit', action: vi.fn() },
+ CommandKind.FILE,
+ );
+
+ const result = setupProcessorHook([quitCommand], [exitCommand]);
+ await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.slashCommands).toHaveLength(2));
+
+ await act(async () => {
+ await result.current.handleSlashCommand('/exit');
+ });
+
+ // It should be added to the history.
+ expect(mockAddItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+ { type: MessageType.USER, text: '/exit' },
+ expect.any(Number),
+ );
+ });
});
describe('Lifecycle', () => {