| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
This commit significantly improves the `replace` tool's robustness by introducing a multi-stage correction mechanism. This directly addresses challenges with LLM-generated tool inputs, particularly the over-escaping of strings sometimes observed with Gemini models, and other minor discrepancies that previously led to failed edits.
The correction process is as follows:
1. **Targeted Unescaping:** The system first applies a specialized unescaping function to the `old_string` and `new_string` to counteract common LLM-induced escaping patterns.
2. **LLM-Powered Discrepancy Resolution:** If a unique match for the `old_string` is still not found, the system leverages a Gemini model (`gemini-2.5-flash-preview-04-17`) to:
* Identify the most probable intended `old_string` in the file by intelligently correcting minor formatting or escaping differences.
* Adjust the `new_string` to correspond with any corrections made to the `old_string`, maintaining the original edit's intent.
This enhancement makes the `replace` tool more resilient and effective, leading to a higher success rate for automated code modifications. The `expected_replacements` parameter has been removed as the tool now focuses on finding a single, unique, and correctable match. The tool's description and error reporting have been updated to reflect these new capabilities.
Fixes https://b.corp.google.com/issues/416933027
|
|
- Currently there's a bug in the API (or SDK?) where the SDK endpoint will commonly fail with:
```
Error: Failed to generate JSON content: got status: 400 Bad Request. {"error":{"code":400,"message":"* GenerateContentRequest.contents[5].parts: contents.parts must not be empty.\n","status":"INVALID_ARGUMENT"}}
```
- At times the model will respond with an empty parts list where if we send that back up to the API endpoint it explodes with the above. Using a curated history seems like a total hack around this prolbem, and even in the SDK (i'm following up on this), BUT helps mitigate this issue.
|
|
- We now solely use the shell tool. This deletes all content around the legacy terminal tool so we can focus on improving the new Shell tool.
- Remove instances from sandboxing, tests, utilities etc.
|
|
- The goal of this is to enable us to better diagnose server issues when they occur.
- Added tests because why not.
|
|
- There seems to be a root model bug where the model will preemptively bail on conversations without trying harder. Typically the stops are VERY obvious and bug-looking where you need to prmopt the model to "continue".
- This PR attempts to fix the above by running a 2.0-flash request (don't need somethign more powerful) at the end of every full interaction to see who should speak (user or model).
- Add tests for nextSpeakerChecker
Fixes https://b.corp.google.com/issues/416826051
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Added helper for extracting text content from responses without warning.
See fixed issue for more detail: https://b.corp.google.com/issues/414005146
|
|
|
|
Also address the open readability improvement comments from #104.
|
|
Doing some more clean-up:
* Remove confusing continue/break
* Handle empty result
* Rename the file just client.js
|
|
|
|
|
|
Else branches are an anti pattern especially if you can easily return from the previous branch. Over time, else branches cause deep nesting and make code unreadable and unmaintainable. Remove elses where possible.
|
|
- The tl;dr; is that GC couldn't see what the user was saying when tool call events happened in response. The rason why this was happening was because we were instantly invoking tools that the model told us to invoke and then instantly re-requesting. This resulted in the bug because the genai APIs can't update the chat history before a full response has been completed (doesn't know how to update if it's incomplete).
- To address the above issue I had to do quite the large refactor. The gist is that now turns truly drive everything on the server (vs. a server client split). This ensured that when we got tool invocations we could control when/how re-requesting would happen and then also ensure that history was updated. This change also meant that the server would act as an event publisher to enable the client to react to events rather than try and weave in complex logic between the events.
- A BIG change that this changeset incudes is the removal of all of the CLI tools in favor of the server tools.
- Removed some dead code as part of this
- **NOTE: Confirmations are still broken (they were broken prior to this); however, I've set them up to be able to work in the future, I'll dot hat in a follow up to be less breaking to others.**
Fixes https://b.corp.google.com/issues/412320087
|
|
* Starting to move a lot of code into packages/server
* More of the massive refactor, builds and runs, some issues though.
* Fixing outstanding issue with double messages.
* Fixing a minor UI issue.
* Fixing the build post-merge.
* Running formatting.
* Addressing comments.
|
