From a253f39d68efa0da62ed076735f783deb0069ff3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pietro Gagliardi <pietro10@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 21:30:19 -0400
Subject: Ported over the sizing framework from the old package and implemented
 it on the GTK+ backend.

---
 redo/sizing_unix.go | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 redo/sizing_unix.go

(limited to 'redo/sizing_unix.go')

diff --git a/redo/sizing_unix.go b/redo/sizing_unix.go
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..da3791e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/redo/sizing_unix.go
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+// +build !darwin
+
+// 23 february 2014
+
+package ui
+
+// #include "gtk_unix.h"
+import "C"
+
+type sizing struct {
+	sizingbase
+
+	// for size calculations
+	// gtk+ needs nothing
+
+	// for the actual resizing
+	shouldVAlignTop	bool
+}
+
+const (
+	gtkXMargin = 12
+	gtkYMargin = 12
+	gtkXPadding = 12
+	gtkYPadding = 6
+)
+
+func (w *window) beginResize() (d *sizing) {
+	d = new(sizing)
+	if w.spaced {
+		d.xmargin = gtkXMargin
+		d.ymargin = gtkYMargin
+		d.xpadding = gtkXPadding
+		d.ypadding = gtkYPadding
+	}
+	return d
+}
+
+func (w *window) endResize(d *sizing) {
+	C.gtk_widget_queue_draw(w.widget)
+}
+
+func (w *window) translateAllocationCoords(allocations []*allocation, winwidth, winheight int) {
+	// no need for coordinate conversion with gtk+
+}
+
+func (w *widgetbase) allocate(x int, y int, width int, height int, d *sizing) []*allocation {
+        return []*allocation{&allocation{
+                x:      x,
+                y:      y,
+                width:  width,
+                height: height,
+                this:   w,
+        }}
+}
+
+func (w *widgetbase) commitResize(c *allocation, d *sizing) {
+// TODO
+/*
+	if s.ctype == c_label && !s.alternate && c.neighbor != nil {
+		c.neighbor.getAuxResizeInfo(d)
+		if d.shouldVAlignTop {
+			// TODO should it be center-aligned to the first line or not
+			gtk_misc_set_alignment(s.widget, 0, 0)
+		} else {
+			gtk_misc_set_alignment(s.widget, 0, 0.5)
+		}
+	}
+*/
+	// TODO this uses w.parentw directly; change?
+	C.gtk_layout_move(w.parentw.layout, w.widget, C.gint(c.x), C.gint(c.y))
+	C.gtk_widget_set_size_request(w.widget, C.gint(c.width), C.gint(c.height))
+}
+
+func (w *widgetbase) getAuxResizeInfo(d *sizing) {
+//TODO
+//	d.shouldVAlignTop = (s.ctype == c_listbox) || (s.ctype == c_area)
+	d.shouldVAlignTop = false
+}
+
+// GTK+ 3 makes this easy: controls can tell us what their preferred size is!
+// ...actually, it tells us two things: the "minimum size" and the "natural size".
+// The "minimum size" is the smallest size we /can/ display /anything/. The "natural size" is the smallest size we would /prefer/ to display.
+// The difference? Minimum size takes into account things like truncation with ellipses: the minimum size of a label can allot just the ellipses!
+// So we use the natural size instead.
+// There is a warning about height-for-width controls, but in my tests this isn't an issue.
+// For Areas, we manually save the Area size and use that, just to be safe.
+
+// We don't need to worry about y-offset because label alignment is "vertically center", which GtkLabel does for us.
+
+func (w *widgetbase) preferredSize(d *sizing) (width int, height int) {
+//TODO
+/*
+	if s.ctype == c_area {
+		return s.areawidth, s.areaheight
+	}
+*/
+
+	var r C.GtkRequisition
+
+	C.gtk_widget_get_preferred_size(w.widget, nil, &r)
+	return int(r.width), int(r.height)
+}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3